Blog
The Communication Crisis: Why Most Leadership Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)
Related Articles:
Three weeks ago, I watched a senior manager at a Fortune 500 company tell his team that "communication is a two-way street" during a quarterly review meeting. The irony? He'd spent the previous forty-five minutes talking without taking a single question. Classic.
After seventeen years in workplace training and business consulting across Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane, I've seen enough communication "experts" to fill the MCG twice over. And here's what nobody wants to admit: most of what we're teaching about workplace communication is outdated corporate theatre that wouldn't survive five minutes in a real workplace crisis.
The Problem with Perfect Scripts
Walk into any communication skills workshop and you'll hear the same tired mantras. "Use active listening." "Mirror their body language." "Repeat back what they've said." All lovely in theory. About as useful as a chocolate teapot when Karen from accounts is having a meltdown about the new expense system.
I used to be one of those trainers. Stood up there with my PowerPoint slides, teaching people to nod at precisely the right intervals and maintain eye contact for exactly three seconds. The works. Then I had my own workplace communication disaster that taught me more in twenty minutes than all those textbooks combined.
Real communication isn't about following scripts. It's messy. Uncomfortable. Sometimes you interrupt people because what they're saying is genuinely time-wasting nonsense, and that's okay.
What Australian Workplaces Actually Need
Here's my controversial take: Australians are naturally more direct than most cultures, and we should stop apologising for it. We don't need to wrap every piece of feedback in seventeen layers of diplomatic cushioning. We need clarity, not courtesy theatre.
The best communicators I know break all the traditional rules. They interrupt when necessary. They disagree openly. They ask uncomfortable questions that nobody else will ask. And somehow, miraculously, their teams perform better and report higher job satisfaction.
Take David from a construction company I worked with last year. Absolute nightmare by traditional communication standards. Interrupts constantly, never uses people's names, talks over others in meetings. His crew? Most productive on the entire project. Why? Because when David speaks, it's always relevant, always actionable, and never wastes anyone's time.
The Authenticity Factor Nobody Talks About
Traditional communication training assumes everyone should communicate the same way. Speak slowly, use inclusive language, maintain appropriate professional distance. But some of the most effective workplace communicators I've encountered would fail every conventional assessment.
There's Sarah who runs a digital marketing agency in Surry Hills. Swears like a sailor, calls out bad ideas immediately, and has zero patience for corporate speak. Her client retention rate? 94%. Her team turnover? Practically non-existent. Because authenticity builds trust faster than any communication technique ever invented.
I'm not advocating for workplace rudeness. I'm suggesting that maybe, just maybe, we've overcomplicated something that should be fundamentally simple.
The Technology Excuse
Everyone blames digital communication for workplace problems. "People don't know how to have face-to-face conversations anymore." "Email kills nuance." "Slack is destroying workplace culture."
Bollocks.
I've seen more productive workplace discussions happen over Teams chat than in formal meetings. I've watched complex project problems get solved through WhatsApp groups that would have taken hours in conference rooms. The medium isn't the problem. The fear of being direct is the problem.
The most successful teams I work with use technology to enhance communication, not replace it. They're not afraid to pick up the phone when a text conversation gets complicated. They don't hide behind email when difficult conversations need to happen.
What Actually Moves the Needle
After working with over 200 Australian businesses, I've identified three communication patterns that consistently improve workplace performance:
Assumption Testing: Instead of assuming you understand what someone means, ask clarifying questions immediately. Not the fluffy "can you tell me more about that" stuff. Specific questions. "When you say 'soon,' do you mean by Friday or by end of month?"
Permission-Based Directness: "I'm going to be blunt here, is that okay?" gives people a heads-up without sugar-coating your message. It's amazingly effective because most people prefer directness once they know it's coming.
Context Over Courtesy: Explain why you're saying something before you say it. "I need to interrupt because we're running out of time and this decision affects tomorrow's client meeting." People can handle directness when they understand the reasoning.
These aren't revolutionary concepts. They're just honest approaches that acknowledge how people actually work together.
The Leadership Communication Myth
Here's where I'll probably lose some readers: most leadership communication advice is designed for people who were never meant to be leaders in the first place.
Real leaders don't need to learn how to "command presence" or "project authority." These things happen naturally when you know what you're talking about and genuinely care about outcomes. The fact that we're teaching people techniques to appear confident suggests we're promoting the wrong people.
The best workplace communicators I know became good at it because they had something important to say and found effective ways to say it. Not because they attended a weekend workshop on "Executive Presence."
I once worked with a warehouse supervisor who could barely spell but could communicate complex safety procedures to multilingual teams better than any university-educated manager I'd met. His secret? He understood that communication is about getting results, not sounding impressive.
The Australian Advantage
We have a natural communication advantage in this country that we consistently undervalue. Australians are comfortable with informality, suspicious of pretension, and generally prefer straight talking to corporate jargon.
Yet most communication training tries to make us more like American business culture. More polished, more diplomatic, more politically correct. It's like trying to make a V8 engine run on premium unleaded when it was designed for regular petrol.
The most successful Australian businesses I work with embrace our cultural communication style rather than fighting it. They've figured out how to be direct without being disrespectful, informal without being unprofessional.
Moving Forward
The communication skills industry needs to stop pretending that workplace interaction is a science that can be perfected through training programs. It's an art that improves through practice, feedback, and honest reflection.
Instead of teaching people what to say, we should be helping them figure out what they actually mean. Instead of focusing on delivery techniques, we should be working on clarity of thought. Instead of worrying about how we sound, we should be obsessing over whether we're being understood.
This isn't about abandoning professionalism or giving people permission to be rude. It's about recognising that effective communication happens when people care more about solving problems than protecting feelings.
Most workplace communication problems aren't communication problems at all. They're clarity problems, priority problems, or trust problems disguised as communication issues.
Fix those, and the communication tends to sort itself out.
Other Training Resources: